CALL US

212.557.7200

Workout, Wind-Down, or Chapter 11: Choosing the Right Restructuring Path for New York Restaurants

When your restaurant is struggling, it’s natural to ask: “Do I really need to file bankruptcy?” The honest answer is – not always, but it’s often times either the best (and only) option.

For New York restaurant owners, the real decision is usually between:

  • An out‑of‑court workout
  • A controlled wind‑down
  • A Chapter 11 (or Subchapter V) bankruptcy

Choosing the right path is a business decision as much as a legal one.  Additionally, not all options are available to everyone.  The restaurant business is intense and chaotic at times, and that means many restaurant owners wait too long, which leaves them with only one clear option – relief through a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition.  

Start With the Hard Questions

Before picking a tool, you need a diagnosis:

  • Is the concept strong, but the capital structure broken?
  • Are there locations that consistently lose money, even in good times?
  • Is management burned out or ready to fight for a second act?
  • How much of your debt is personally guaranteed?

Without honest answers, you risk throwing good money – and stress – after bad.

Out‑of‑Court Workouts

A workout is a negotiated deal with key creditors, without filing bankruptcy.

Typical moves:

  • Negotiating temporary or permanent rent reductions
  • Stretching out vendor and lender payments
  • Settling litigation for structured payouts
  • Bringing in new capital in exchange for equity

Pros:

  • Private and often faster
  • Less expensive than court supervision
  • Less stigma with customers, staff, and partners

Cons:

  • Requires significant creditor cooperation
  • No automatic stay – aggressive creditors can still sue
  • No binding cramdown on holdouts

Workouts tend to work best when your debt load is manageable and you have a compelling turnaround story that creditors believe.

Controlled Wind‑Downs and Assignments

Sometimes, the right call is to close in an orderly way, not to keep fighting.

That might look like:

  • Selling assets (with or without court involvement)
  • Negotiating key settlements with landlords and lenders
  • Paying employees and taxes carefully to avoid personal exposure
  • Dissolving entities properly under New York law

In some states, businesses use assignments for the benefit of creditors (ABCs) as a state‑law alternative to bankruptcy. The details are technical, but the basic idea is a structured liquidation overseen by an assignee instead of a bankruptcy judge.

Wind‑downs can reduce chaos, preserve relationships, and protect reputations – especially if you plan to be in the industry again.

When Chapter 11 (or Subchapter V) Makes Sense

Bankruptcy becomes more attractive when:

  • You need the automatic stay to stop lawsuits, garnishments, or evictions.
  • You have multiple landlords and secured creditors and can’t get them all aligned.
  • You want to reject bad leases and keep good ones, using Chapter 11 tools.
  • You need a way to bind holdout creditors to a restructuring plan.

Subchapter V can make Chapter 11 more accessible for qualifying restaurants, as discussed above.

Building a Decision Framework

A practical decision framework often includes:

  • 13‑week cash‑flow forecasting
  • Location‑level profit and loss analysis
  • A list of the “must‑have” versus “nice‑to‑have” creditors
  • A candid look at your own energy and timeline

Once you have that picture, the legal tool usually becomes clearer.

Conclusion

There is no one “right” path for every distressed restaurant. Some New York operators successfully restructure through tough negotiations; others need the leverage and tools of Chapter 11; others preserve value by exiting but doing so strategically.

The key is not to wait until you’re out of options. The earlier you explore your choices with a restructuring professional, the more paths you’ll have left.

Meet the Author

Andreas Koutsoudakis is a Partner, litigation attorney, and Co-Chair of Hospitality & Restaurant Law at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron’s New York City office.

With extensive experience as a litigator and trusted legal advisor, Andreas represents business owners, executives, and entrepreneurs in complex commercial disputes, business divorces, and employment-related litigation. As the Partner and Co-Chair of Hospitality & Restaurant Law at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, he uses his in-depth industry knowledge to provide strategic legal solutions for businesses navigating high-stakes disputes, regulatory challenges, and internal conflicts among partners, shareholders, and LLC members.

Skip to content